230 research outputs found

    Twisted conjugacy in braid groups

    Full text link
    In this note we solve the twisted conjugacy problem for braid groups, i.e. we propose an algorithm which, given two braids u,vBnu,v\in B_n and an automorphism ϕAut(Bn)\phi \in Aut (B_n), decides whether v=(ϕ(x))1uxv=(\phi (x))^{-1}ux for some xBnx\in B_n. As a corollary, we deduce that each group of the form BnHB_n \rtimes H, a semidirect product of the braid group BnB_n by a torsion-free hyperbolic group HH, has solvable conjugacy problem

    Orbit decidability and the conjugacy problem for some extensions of groups

    No full text
    Given a short exact sequence of groups with certain conditions, 1 ? F ? G ? H ? 1, weprove that G has solvable conjugacy problem if and only if the corresponding action subgroupA 6 Aut(F) is orbit decidable. From this, we deduce that the conjugacy problem is solvable,among others, for all groups of the form Z2?Fm, F2?Fm, Fn?Z, and Zn?A Fm with virtually solvable action group A 6 GLn(Z). Also, we give an easy way of constructing groups of the form Z4?Fn and F3?Fn with unsolvable conjugacy problem. On the way, we solve the twisted conjugacy problem for virtually surface and virtually polycyclic groups, and give an example of a group with solvable conjugacy problem but unsolvable twisted conjugacy problem. As an application, an alternative solution to the conjugacy problem in Aut(F2) is given

    On the complexity of the Whitehead minimization problem

    Full text link
    The Whitehead minimization problem consists in finding a minimum size element in the automorphic orbit of a word, a cyclic word or a finitely generated subgroup in a finite rank free group. We give the first fully polynomial algorithm to solve this problem, that is, an algorithm that is polynomial both in the length of the input word and in the rank of the free group. Earlier algorithms had an exponential dependency in the rank of the free group. It follows that the primitivity problem -- to decide whether a word is an element of some basis of the free group -- and the free factor problem can also be solved in polynomial time.Comment: v.2: Corrected minor typos and mistakes, improved the proof of the main technical lemma (Statement 2.4); added a section of open problems. 30 page

    Algebraic extensions in free groups

    Full text link
    The aim of this paper is to unify the points of view of three recent and independent papers (Ventura 1997, Margolis, Sapir and Weil 2001 and Kapovich and Miasnikov 2002), where similar modern versions of a 1951 theorem of Takahasi were given. We develop a theory of algebraic extensions for free groups, highlighting the analogies and differences with respect to the corresponding classical field-theoretic notions, and we discuss in detail the notion of algebraic closure. We apply that theory to the study and the computation of certain algebraic properties of subgroups (e.g. being malnormal, pure, inert or compressed, being closed in certain profinite topologies) and the corresponding closure operators. We also analyze the closure of a subgroup under the addition of solutions of certain sets of equations.Comment: 35 page

    Intersection problem for Droms RAAGs

    Get PDF
    We solve the subgroup intersection problem (SIP) for any RAAG G of Droms type (i.e., with defining graph not containing induced squares or paths of length 3): there is an algorithm which, given finite sets of generators for two subgroups H,K of G, decides whether HKH \cap K is finitely generated or not, and, in the affirmative case, it computes a set of generators for HKH \cap K. Taking advantage of the recursive characterization of Droms groups, the proof consists in separately showing that the solvability of SIP passes through free products, and through direct products with free-abelian groups. We note that most of RAAGs are not Howson, and many (e.g. F_2 x F_2) even have unsolvable SIP.Comment: 33 pages, 12 figures (revised following the referee's suggestions

    Degree of commutativity of infinite groups

    Get PDF
    First published in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society in volum 145, number 2, 2016, published by the American Mathematical SocietyWe prove that, in a finitely generated residually finite group of subexponential growth, the proportion of commuting pairs is positive if and only if the group is virtually abelian. In particular, this covers the case where the group has polynomial growth (i.e., virtually nilpotent groups, where the hypothesis of residual finiteness is always satisfied). We also show that, for non-elementary hyperbolic groups, the proportion of commuting pairs is always zero.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Bounding the gap between a free group (outer) automorphism and its inverse

    Get PDF
    For any finitely generated group GG, two complexity functions αG\alpha_G and βG\beta_G are defined to measure the maximal possible gap between the norm of an automorphism (respectively outer automorphism) of GG and the norm of its inverse. Restricting attention to free groups FrF_r, the exact asymptotic behaviour of α2\alpha_2 and β2\beta_2 is computed. For rank r3r\geqslant 3, polynomial lower bounds are provided for αr\alpha_r and βr\beta_r, and the existence of a polynomial upper bound is proved for βr\beta_r.Comment: 24 pages; To appear in Collectanea Mathematic
    corecore